Our site will be undergoing maintenance from 6 a.m. - 6 p.m. ET on Saturday, May 20. During this time, Bookshop, checkout, and other features will be unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Cookies must be enabled to use this website.
Book Image Not Available Book Image Not Available
Book details
  • Genre:BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
  • SubGenre:Finance / General
  • Language:English
  • Pages:319
  • eBook ISBN:9780990570684

Online Education Fraud

The Diary of a Short Seller

by Robert MacArthur

Book Image Not Available Book Image Not Available
Overview
In the mid-to-late 1990’s, the Department of Education had serious concerns about one of the country’s largest schools, Computer Learning Centers (CLC). With over two dozen locations nationwide, CLC had grown rapidly through its use of federal loan money. In early 1998, the Illinois Attorney General filed a fraud lawsuit against CLC, which prompted a “program review” by the Department of the company’s main campus and several branch schools in the Washington, DC area. WJLA TV in Washington, DC went into the school with hidden cameras, obtaining footage of enrollment counselors violating federal laws. CLC was caught shredding documents the night before federal investigators arrived. Around 2000 or 2001, the Department of Education published a Final Determination Letter concluding that all of CLC’s enrollment counselors were being paid commission based on the number of students they enrolled (i.e. a quota system.) As a result, the US Department of Education demanded that all Title IV monies received by CLC be returned to the federal government. This amounted to approximately $185 million dollars. That action put CLC into bankruptcy. CLC’s stock went from $40 to zero from 1998 to 2001. Several other up and coming for-profit schools watched, concerned about their own recruiting practices, as many of them were already using incentive compensation schemes. After CLC the 12 other public companies began to recruit former CLC employees making the problem much worse with few consequences for breaking the laws around recruiting. The book covers 2001-2008 and then covers 2009 to 2010 as the main body. In the main body are several interviews with former employees at several for-profit schools. I provided the government with some of the interview material. By 2012 several of the companies in the group were trading under $5.
Description
In the mid-to-late 1990’s, the Department of Education had serious concerns about one of the country’s largest for-profit schools, Computer Learning Centers (CLC). With over two dozen locations nationwide, CLC had grown rapidly through its use of federal loan money. In early 1998, the Illinois Attorney General filed a fraud lawsuit against CLC, which prompted a “program review” by the Department of Education of the company’s main campus and several branch schools in the Washington, DC area. WJLA TV in Washington, DC went into the school with hidden cameras, obtaining footage of enrollment counselors violating federal laws. CLC was caught shredding documents the night before federal investigators arrived. Around 2000 or 2001, the Department of Education published a Final Determination Letter concluding that all of CLC’s enrollment counselors were being paid commission based on the number of students they enrolled (i.e. a quota system.) As a result, the US Department of Education demanded that all Title IV monies received by CLC be returned to the federal government. This amounted to approximately $185 million dollars. That action put CLC into bankruptcy. CLC’s stock went from $40 to zero from 1998 to 2001. Several other up and coming for-profit schools watched, concerned about their own recruiting practices, as many of them were already using incentive compensation schemes. Also in the 2003-2004 timeframe, another for-profit education company, Career Education (“CEC”), ran into trouble, this time with an accreditor. Career Education had acquired small for-profit companies, opening many schools over a short period of time. Some of them were in California. CEC quickly developed a bad reputation in the industry for its recruiting efforts. However, they were able to show growth. From 2000 to 2004 the company’s stock price went from $5 to $75, turning the CEO into a billionaire. However in the latter half of 2004, CEC ran into trouble with the law and regulators. Several lawsuits were filed against the company across the country, by students, employees, etc. The California Attorney General, in particular, went after CEC aggressively after receiving many complaints from students. Amongst other things, this later prompted the company’s accreditor to suspend CEC’s ability to recruit students for its online division. So, the company simply set up shop in another part of country and got a different and less restrictive accreditor; however, that took a year to complete, causing the stock to drop from $75 back to $25. Having made their money, senior management quit. On May 26, 2005, John Higgins, the Inspector General from the ED, testified in Congress on the dangers of for-profit education: “Violations of this requirement occur when refunds are not paid timely, when incorrect calculations result in returning insufficient funds, and when institutions fail to pay refunds at all, which is a criminal offense under the HEA.” Higgins declared, “Historically, fraud and abuse predominantly involves proprietary schools. In fact, over the last six completed fiscal years the majority—approximately 74 percent—of our institutional fraud cases involved proprietary schools.” In 2009, with the Obama administration in place, the environment changed substantially. The Obama administration immediately hired Bob Shireman as deputy undersecretary at the DOE; Shireman had formerly been at the DOE under President Clinton. The first issue to be addressed was the revocation of the Safe Harbors, which would effectively render incentive compensation illegal--again.
About the author
Robert MacArthur has 20 years of investment experience. In his early years he began researching short sell ideas for hedge funds. Short ideas anticipate when a stock declines, allowing hedge funds to make money as the stock falls. Starting in 1998 Rob began researching for-profit education fraud. For the next 15 years he sought to uncover massive fraud at the for-profit education companies, mainly University of Phoenix. In 2009, through firsthand interviews and hard to get government reports he pressed state and federal regulators to investigate the industry. By 2010 the SEC opened a revenue recognition fraud investigation and later opened an insider trading investigation drawing more scrutiny. It had the look and smell of subprime lending for mortgages. Are these schools too big to fail? By 2014, 32 state Attorney General were investigating the industry. This is his story.